BUILD WITH TALVIEW

Add Proctoring to Your Platform

Take the whole layer, or only the part you are missing.

Book a Demo
Customer education_how talview can help

Your clients have started asking you to prove who was actually in the exam or the interview. Talview proves who is there, names what is happening while it happens, and leaves a record that holds up if the result is challenged. Your brand stays on the candidate experience.

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
WCAG 2.1 AA
US Patent 12,361,115 B1
WHY THIS IS ON YOUR ROADMAP

The requirement moved from your client’s process into your product

Verifying who was on the other end used to be the exam owner’s problem. It is now a line item in the RFPs they send you.

The same tools that sit a certification exam sit a technical interview, and they have pricing pages. Cluely. Parakeet. Interview Sidekick. FinalRound. Your clients know those names, which is why the question reached you and not them.

A threat model that has not changed in three years is not conservative. It is obsolete.

Take what your product is missing, not a bundle

Most platforms here already schedule, already own the interface, already score. What is missing is narrower than a whole product.

IDENTITY

prove who is there

ID document authenticity · details match · face match at onboarding and mid-session · liveness · MS Teams verification

Taken alone by:

an ATS whose clients ask who was in the interview.

CONTEXT

name what is happening, while it happens

Secure browser · app and process detection · device and peripheral checks · secondary camera · keyboard and navigation · screen capture block

Taken alone by:

a platform whose SSO already carries identity.

RECORD

leave an account that holds up

Session flags · reviewer log, every action with a mandatory reason · evidence pack · recording review · scoring and reporting

Taken alone by:

a platform with detection that cannot defend a result on appeal. This is the piece a build discovers in year two.

How the session is run

Mode What it means Chosen for
Automated No human in the session Volume, lower stakes
Record and review Reviewed after the fact, against the record A decision needed, but not live
Live proctoring A human invigilator, Alvy as copilot Certification and licensure
In-centre Delivered at a physical test centre Where the regulator requires it

One integration carries all four. Moving a client from automated to live proctoring is a configuration change, not a second build.

Pick the pieces. The architecture underneath them does not change.

Three ways platforms compose it

Find the one that looks like your product

01

An ATS that needs identity, and nothing else. Your clients run interviews in your product. The RFP question is whether the person on the call is the person who applied. Take Identity. Face match at join and mid-session, ID check where the client needs it, flag lands in your existing record. Route: SDK or extension.

Route SDK or extension
02

An assessment platform that needs the session watched and defended. You own the bank, the delivery, the scoring. You do not own what happened on the second screen, or an account of it that survives an appeal. Take Context and Record. Route: extension or SDK.

Route extension or SDK
03

An awarding body or RPO with no engineering team. You need proctored delivery and you are not building a release cycle around it. Take the whole layer on the link wrapper, over your existing exam link, with no integration work. This is how a first exam usually goes live.

Route Link Wrapper
Four ways it goes in

Pick the route that fits your stack, not ours

SDK / JavaScript — built into your product. Your interface, your flow, your brand.

LMS extension — for Moodle, Canvas and the platforms your clients already run. No change to your delivery layer.

Link wrapper — sits over an existing link. No integration, no release cycle.

Proctoring API — call the layer directly and own the session lifecycle.

A sixty-minute architecture session tells you which route fits, which capabilities you need, and what your team owns after go-live. No commitment.

WHERE THE LINE SITS

What stays yours, what we carry, what moves

Capability Default Owner Movable?
Question bank, content, formats, scoring You No
Registration, interface, the brand candidates see You No
Scheduling, bookings, reminders You Yes — take ours if you do not do it
Identity checks Talview Yes — leave it if your SSO carries it
Session control and context detection Talview Yes — most platforms cannot leave it
The record, reviewer log, evidence pack Talview Yes, but detection without a record fails on appeal
The threat model Talview No
Device, browser and OS coverage Talview No
SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, WCAG, DPIA for the layer Talview No
Proctor training, L2 review, escalation Either Yes — yours, ours, or split
The disqualification decision Your client’s reviewer Never

Talview names what happened. Your client decides what it means.

What building it yourself involves

The part of the build that does not end

You will cost the build anyway. This is also the argument for composing: each piece is its own multi-year programme.

  • It is not one feature. Identity, detection, an evidence trail, and a threat model that moves every time a new tool ships. Teams cost the first and find the other three in year two.

  • Detection is the visible half. Behind it sits the incident engine, policy rules, reviewer workflow and evidence packaging. That second build decides whether the first was worth anything.

  • Accuracy needs volume you do not have. Thresholds have to be tuned so a cough does not flag a candidate and a second person in the room does not pass. A new build earns that calibration from its own first clients.

  • Compliance is a permanent line. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, accessibility, DPIA, consent under eighteen, EU AI Act alignment. The first certificate is the start of the cost.

  • The operational layer is invisible until an exam day goes wrong. Proctor training, L2 review, escalation, support across time zones, disputes. None of it is in the code base.

  • Every engineer on this is an engineer not on your product. Your clients pay you for the assessment and the outcome. Not for a secure browser.

When building it yourself is right

Four cases where we would tell you to build

Condition Test
Proctoring is your product Does it sit in your top line, or in your cost of delivery?
Sovereignty no provider will contract for Ask for private deployment and escrow terms first [CONFIRM]
A modality nobody captures Put the requirement to two providers before calling it unique
A security team you already have Count engineers who shipped these capabilities, not headcount

Outside those four: keep what makes your platform yours, take the pieces you are missing

The partnership

Terms you can put in your own RFP responses

  • Your brand on the candidate experience.

  • Roadmap influence. Quarterly product council.

  • Deal support when a client’s RFP hits a verification requirement.

  • Compliance you inherit — certificates, DPIA and model documentation that already exist.

  • Data residency.

  • Exit terms in writing — data return, transition, notice.

Proof

What we can show, and what we cannot yet

Proof Customer Condition
Delivered across 170+ countries
Their footprint as a partner
Test-takers grew from 2,000 to 30,000
Their result, their engagement
200+ delivery agents onboarded
Attributed to Talview proctoring
12,000 students a semester
Their deployment, not a promise
80% reduction in proxy attempts
Their result, their engagement

Each is one named customer’s result in one engagement. None is an AI-era detection result.

What we do not publish yet. No customer account of documenting a deepfake or AI-assisted attempt in a live session, and none of the record settling a challenged result. Both are what the first partner pilots are designed to produce. You hear it from us before a reference call.

Band: SOC 2 Type II · ISO 27001 · GDPR · WCAG 2.1 AA · G2 leader, proctoring · Time Top EdTech 2024 · Velocity Network Foundation · US Patent 12,361,115 B1

Recognized as the Best in 43 Categories

G2-Logo
placeholder_200x200

Run one exam through it before you decide anything

 

Architecture session, then sandbox, then one exam or one requisition. No stage obliges the next. If the decision after that is still to build, it is made with the alternative understood.

Book a Demo
Products
Company
Resources
Sales

US +1-650-844-2588

IN +91-80-4521-0929

us@talview.com

Contact Sales
Book a Meeting
Comparison
Help & Support
Why Talview
Our Compliance & Certifications
GDPR
WCAG 2.1
SOC2
ISO 27001

Download Our Mobile App

  • app-store
  •  
  •  
  • playstore

For Candidate

  • app-store
  •  
  •  
  • playstore

For Recruiter

Talview is a member of Velocity Network Foundation

Find Us Online

© 2026 Talview | All Rights Reserved

Trust Center | Terms of Use | Privacy